Past technical recommendations such as IEC/TR as well as newer specifications such as IEC/TS are both used by power utilities for insulator selection in polluted outdoor environments.
If you want to learn more, please visit our website Yipeng.
Yipeng Product Page
This edited contribution to INMR by Dr. Wallace Vosloo, retired from Eskom, Richardo Davey of Eskom Research Testing and Johannes Bekker at the University of Stellenbosch in South Africa reviewed different possible approaches in this regard.
Selecting porcelain and glass insulators for three-phase a.c. systems up to 525 kV phase-to-phase using IEC/TR (Guide for the selection of insulators in respect of polluted conditions) has been based on service experience as well as laboratory testing under naturally and artificially polluted conditions. As stated in this document: Simple general rules should assist choosing the insulator, which should give satisfactory performance under polluted conditions.
Fig. 2 and Table 2 summarize basic profiling rules recommended in IEC/TR , which are normally followed.
Influence of insulator diameter on pollution performance is also considered for insulators with average diameters of between 300 and 500 mm. In the case of diameters greater than 500 mm, it is recommended that specific creepage distances be increased by 10% and 20%. Laboratory tests, in accordance with IEC 507, are also recommended to evaluate an insulator’s pollution performance but are rarely used by most power utilities. Greasing or washing is recommended for areas with severe pollution and/or low natural washing.
For a.c. porcelain and glass insulators, a utility would typically specify maximum connection length taking into account live line work, minimum dry arcing distance, and minimum creepage distance. Then, it would be stated that insulator profile must comply with IEC/TR , the focus being on simplicity and ease of use.
It is proposed to erect 132 kV lines in areas with pollution levels ranging from Light to Very Heavy using standard glass cap & pin disc insulators (U120B, F12/146). Assuming the parameters given below, how many discs (n) would be required per string?
System highest voltage (Um) = 145 kV
Minimum required Dry Arcing Distance (DAD) of the insulator string is mm (i.e. for a high lightning area)
Disc spacing (s) = 146 mm
Arcing distance per disc (a) = 210 mm
Creepage distance (CD) per disc = 320 mm
The arcing distance of a disc insulator string = a + (n – 1) s
Thus, = 210 + (n – 1) x 146 and n = ( – 210) / 146 + 1 = 9.84 (in other words, 10 discs are required)
In terms of pollution level, as shown in Table 1, the specific creepage distances needed for Light, Medium, Heavy and Very Heavy pollution areas are 16, 20, 25 and 31 mm/kV (Um) respectively.
Number of discs required per string = (CD)/320 where CD = (Um x SCD)
Table 3 gives values calculated using (145 x SCD)/320.
Utilities have typically been using 7 to 14 standard glass discs per string for 132 kV lines. More recently, with the advent of new ‘active’ polymeric insulation materials that interact with the environment, utilities have continued to use IEC/TR since nothing else was available in IEC.
Typically, for a.c. polymer insulators, utilities such as Eskom would specify maximum connecting length (taking into account live line work), minimum dry arcing distance and minimum creepage distance. They would also state that insulator profile must:
1. comply with IEC/TR based on in-service and test station experience;
2. have open aerodynamic alternating shed profile with S/P ratio ≥ 1; and
3. that the material must be hydrophobic, with good hydrophobicity transfer capabilities.
Then, for e.g. ease of stock, minimum SCDs of 20 mm/kV for Light to Medium and 31 mm/kV for Heavy to Very Heavy pollution areas would be specified.
Insulation requirements for both UHV a.c. and d.c. insulators are more complex and normally determined along with technical experts from manufacturers (mostly members of Cigré WGs).
The following major changes have been made with respect to IEC/TR :
• Encouraging use of site pollution severity measurements, preferably over at least a year, in order to classify a site instead of the previous qualitative assessment (see below).
• Recognition that ‘solid’ pollution on insulators has two components: one soluble and quantified by ESDD; the other insoluble and quantified by NSDD.
• Recognition that, in some cases, measuring layer conductivity should be used for SPS determination.
• Using results of natural and artificial pollution tests to help with dimensioning and to gain more experience in order to promote future studies to establish a correlation between site and laboratory severities.
• Recognition that creepage length is not always the sole determining parameter.
• Recognizing the influence of other geometry parameters and of the varying importance of parameters according to the size, type and material of insulators.
• Recognition of the varying importance of parameters according to type of pollution.
• Adoption of correction factors to attempt to take into account influence of the above pollution and insulator parameters.
Fig. 3 shows three approaches proposed for selection and dimensioning of insulators.
Fig. 4 provides Eskom’s specifications for determining site pollution severity and pollution performance curves.
It has been proposed to erect a 132 kV substation and interconnecting lines at Koeberg Nuclear Power Station (KNPS) along the South African west coast. The area is approximately 600 m from the coastal high-water mark and is exposed to strong coastal winds, low rainfall and regular salt fog events. The insulators (substation: 189 – posts (4 kN), 294 – hollow cores (average diameter <400 mm), 387 – long rods/strings (120 kN, ball and socket) and lines: 768 – long rods/strings (120 kN, ball and socket)) should have a maximum connecting length of 1.48 ± 0.02 m, minimum insulation length of 1.2 m, minimum dry arcing distance of 1.5 m and minimum specific creepage distance of 31 mm/kV (CD ≥ mm). In addition, insulators with open aerodynamic alternating shed profiles, S/P ratio ≥1, hydrophobic material and good hydrophobicity transfer capabilities are preferred.
The question is what insulation is required to ensure risk of insulator flashover is minimal, with mean time between flashover (MTBF) of at least 50 years?
Approach 1: Use Past Experience
Duinefontein 132 kV Substation (≈600 m from the coastal high-water mark) is situated only ≈1 km from the new proposed 132 kV substation and interconnecting lines area at KNPS.
In , the 60 porcelain station post insulators installed at the Duinefontein Substation that have a specific creepage distance of 32.4 mm/kV were upgraded (along with all other insulation) using room temperature vulcanized silicone rubber coating (RTV SR A). Prior to this upgrade (since washing did not work and greasing had only a 6 to 12 month effective lifespan) the substation experienced flashovers on an annual basis, including the Type B instantaneous event of February . Since the upgrade, no flashovers occurred to date (18 years later), which includes the catastrophic Type B instantaneous pollution event experienced in February . Indeed, the RTV SR A coating still has excellent hydrophobic properties.
Personnel from the KNPS Weather Station (≈250 m from Duinefontein Substation) classify the area as follows:
• Average ambient temperatures between 14° and 20°C (minimum 4°C and maximum 36°C);
• Exposed to strong coastal winds (gusts up to 35 m/s);
• Low rainfall area (≈320 mm per year) with only 3 to 5 rainy days in summer (≈80 mm)
• High humidity levels at night/early morning and regular salt fog events (≈40 per year).
ESDD, NSDD and DDDG pollution measurements at the Duinefontein Substation from March to date, were used to calculate ESDD2% = 0.165 mg/cm2 (STDEV = 0.57), average ratio of NSDD/ESDD = 1.1 and monthly average DDDGave = 382 µS/cm.
The flashover of a bare porcelain 132 kV breaker support insulator (having specific creepage distance 32.4 mm/kV) during the catastrophic Type B instantaneous pollution event experienced in the Cape in Feb was used to estimate minimum uniform pollution present on insulation during this event, namely ESDD = 0.4 mg/cm2 and NSDD = 0.182 mg/cm2. Field experience has shown that, while instantaneous pollution events will not occur annually, it can be conservatively assumed that one event occurs each year.
Pollution levels at Duinefontein Substation are as follows:
Type A: 40 natural pre-deposited pollution events per year with critical wetting (ESDD2% = 0.165 mg/cm2 with STD deviation of 0.57 and ESDD/NSDD ratio = 1.1).
Type B: One instantaneous conductive fog pollution event per year (ESDD2% = 0.4 mg/cm2 and NSDD = 0.182 mg/cm2).
The SPS levels obtained from ESDD and NSDD measurements at Duinefontein Substation (see Fig 5) classify the area for Type A pollution (E6/7) d – Heavy and Type B (E7) e – Very Heavy. DDDG measurements, after climatic factor correction, classify the area as Very Heavy.
The 60 RTV SR A coated porcelain station post insulators with SCD of 32.4 mm/kV at Duinefontein Substation (≈1 km from the new proposed 132 kV substation and lines area) have provided excellent performance for 18 years. Note: these same 60 bare porcelain station post insulators had flashed over more than once annually. No washing or greasing was recommended.
Koeberg Insulator Pollution Test Station (KIPTS) (≈50 m from the coastal high-water mark) lies about 2 km from the new proposed 132 kV substation and lines area. Monthly average DDDGave = µS/cm measured at KIPTS is Extreme (≈6.6 times higher compared to Duinefontein Substation). Findings of some insulator research and tests done at KIPTS over 15 years are presented in “Power Utility Perspective on Natural Ageing and Pollution Performance Insulator Test Stations”.
From natural insulator pollution performance experience gained at KIPTS the following:
Posts: Porcelain post insulators with SCD = 38 mm/kV will flashover more than 3 times per year at KIPTS;
RTV SR A coated porcelain post insulators with SCD ≥ 24 mm/kV will have no flashovers per year at KIPTS. RTV SR A coated porcelain transformer bushings at KIPTS with SCD = 30 mm/kV will perform well for 15 years;
Open aerodynamic alternating shed profile with S/P ratio ≥ 1 and a hydrophobic material with good hydrophobicity transfer capability will work best.
Hollows: SR hollow core insulators with SCD ≥ 28 mm/kV will have no flashovers per year at KIPTS;
Open aerodynamic alternating shed profile with S/P ratio ≥ 1 and hydrophobic material with a good hydrophobicity transfer capability will work best.
Longrods: SR longrod insulators with SCD ≥ 22 mm/kV will have no flashovers per year at KIPTS;
Open aerodynamic alternating shed profile with S/P ratio ≥ 1 and hydrophobic material with a good hydrophobicity transfer capability will work best.
Note: Corona rings should be installed on 132 kV longrod insulators.
Strings: Standard glass cap & pin disc insulator (F12/146) strings with SCD of 27 mm/kV will flashover more than 3 times per year at KIPTS. The same insulator string with RTV SR A coating applied will have no flashovers per year;
Fog-type glass cap & pin disc insulator (F120P/146) strings with SCD of 37 mm/kV will have no flashovers per year at KIPTS. The same insulator string with RTV SR C coating applied will experience similar leakage currents to SR longrod insulators.
Note: Expect poor natural washing/cleaning and pin erosion problems.
Approach 2 (as per Fig. 3) is used along with Section 12 of IEC/TS -2 for porcelain and glass, and Section 12 of IEC/TS -3 for polymeric insulators.
The pollution and climate at Duinefontein Substation (as in Approach 1) give the expected pollution severity levels and climate in the area of the proposed 132 kV substation and interconnecting 132 kV lines as follows:
Type A: (E6/7) d – Heavy as 40 natural pre-deposited pollution events per year with critical wetting (ESDD2% = 0.165 mg/cm2 with STD deviation of 0.57 and ESDD/NSDD ratio = 1.1).
Type B: (E7) e – Very Heavy as one instantaneous conductive fog pollution event per year (ESDD2% = 0.4 mg/cm2 and NSDD = 0.182 mg/cm2).
Candidate insulators were selected as shown in Table 4, where possible with a maximum connecting length of 1.48 ± 0.02 m, minimum insulation length of 1.2 m, minimum dry arcing distance of 1.5 m, minimum specific creepage distance of 31 mm/kV (CD ≥ mm). Insulators with open aerodynamic alternating shed profile with S/P ratio ≥ 1, and hydrophobic material with good hydrophobicity transfer capabilities. Porcelain post, standard glass and fog type glass insulators were included as reference.
Laboratory pollution U50% flashover voltage (using the rapid flashover test method) curves at three pollution levels (as in Fig. 4) – SDD of 0.06; 0.12 and 0.48 mg/cm2 with NSDD ≥ 0.1 mg/cm2 was obtained using:
• for porcelain and glass insulators the Solid Layer Test Method (see Table 5) according to IEC using Procedure B and spray gun for applying the Kaolin composition and Annex B.3.2. The degree of pollution on the test insulator was determined using the SDD method. Recommendations as given in Annex D and E were followed.
• and, for polymeric insulators according to modified Solid Layer Test Method (see Table 5) with pre-conditioning procedure, and with/without recovery according to Cigre TB 555 and Cigre TB 691.
The rapid flashover laboratory solid layer pollution test done on SR Longrod A insulator to determine U50% = 225 kV at SDD = 0.12 mg/cm2 and NSDD = 0.1 mg/cm2 with 48-hour hydrophobicity recovery is shown in Figure 6 as example. The rapid flashover laboratory solid layer pollution test results for all the candidate insulators are shown in Table 4.
The candidate insulators’ pollution U50% flashover voltage results in Table 4 were then converted into flashover stress along the test insulation length HT = 1.2 m as in kV/m and is presented as a three-point approximated inverse power law curves against pollution level SDD in mg/cm2 in Fig. 7.
The candidate insulator pollution flashover performance curve constants A in kV/m and α was determined for equation U50%/Ht = A · SDD-α and the values are shown in Table 4.
Um-ph/H was calculated as 70 kV/m using the specified insulation length H = 1.2 m, and Um-ph = 83.7 kV (the highest system r.m.s. phase to ground voltage that the insulator to be supplied will be subjected to).
The candidate insulator was accepted for further calculation if U50%/Ht> 70 kV/m in the SDD range of 0.12 to 0.48 mg/cm2.
Insulator pollution flashover performance curve constants A in kV/m and α, of the candidate insulators was used along with pollution severity levels and climate in the area of the proposed 132 kV substation and interconnecting 132 kV lines in the statistical approach as per Annex G of IEC/TS -1 in order to optimize insulation selection. Fig. 8 shows the Insulator Selection Tool, a commercially available statistical software.
As example, using the IST for MTBF of 50 years 768 – 132 kV SR Longrod A insulators require:
• SCD of 20.2 mm/kV when exposed to 40 natural Type A pre-deposited pollution events per year with critical wetting (ESDD2%= 0.165 mg/cm2 with STD deviation of 0.57 and ESDD/NSDD ratio = 1.1) (see Fig. 9);
• and SCD of 22 mm/kV when exposed to one Type B instantaneous conductive fog pollution event per year (ESDD2%= 0.4 mg/cm2 and NSDD = 0.182 mg/cm2) (see Fig. 10).
The MTBF obtainable within the required connecting length of 1.48 ± 0.02 m and SCD needed for MTBF of 50 years was calculated for the reference and candidate insulators using the IST. Results are shown in Table 6.
Approach 3: Measure & Design
As per Fig. 5, the area proposed for the 132 kV substation and interconnecting lines can be classified for Type A pollution as Class d – Heavy and for Type B pollution as Class e – Very Heavy. Thus, in the worst case, a minimum SCD of 31 mm/kV is needed for the reference glass disc insulator.
As per IEC/TS -2, the following is recommended for porcelain and glass insulators:
• Aerodynamic, alternating sheds on long rod insulators, post insulators, hollow core insulators;
• Anti-fog profile for disc insulators;
• p1 – p2 ≥ 15 mm, s/p ≥ 0.65, c ≥ 25 mm, l/d ≤ 5, 5˚ ≤ α ≤ 25˚ and CF ≤ 4 (lowest risk options used);
• No altitude correction required;
• 10% increase in SCD for hollow core insulators with average diameter > 300 mm and < 400 mm.
As per IEC/TS -3, the following is recommended for hydrophobicity transfer polymeric insulators:
• SCD could be reduced or increased depending on the environment or pollution level (no clear advice given);
• Aerodynamic alternating sheds;
Contact us to discuss your requirements of Aerodynamic Glass Insulator. Our experienced sales team can help you identify the options that best suit your needs.
See also:• p1 – p2 ≥ 18 mm, s/p ≥ 0.75, c ≥ 40 mm, l/d ≤ 4.5, 5˚ ≤ α ≤ 25˚ and CF ≤ 4 (lowest risk options used);
• No altitude correction required;
• 10% increase in SCD for hollow core insulators with average diameter > 300 mm and < 400 mm.
Insulators must have a minimum SCD of 31 mm/kV (CD = mm) and hollow core insulators with minimum SCD of 31 x 1.1 = 34.1 mm/kV (CD = mm) are recommended. Table 7 provides a summary and comparison of results obtained for these three Approaches.
As per Table 7, the findings of Approach 1 and 2 correlate with one another, showing that both approaches would work if correct data required as per Fig. 3 is available. The practical examples demonstrate that both approaches lead to a selection having good accuracy. Moreover, as per Table 7, Approach 3 in general would result in over-dimensioning of required insulation.
Table 8 offers a comparison of the recommendations as per IEC/TR and specifications as per Approach 3 in IEC/TS -1 for the practical examples. Findings are similar in regard to specific creepage distance. However, Approach 3 takes into account use of hydrophobicity transfer materials, which could result in a one class lower SCD, different profile parameters and anti-fog instead of open aerodynamic disc insulators.
In summary it has been demonstrated with practical examples, how the old technical recommendation, i.e., IEC/TR and the new technical specification i.e., IEC/TS are being successfully applied by a utility, in this case, Eskom, to select and dimension outdoor insulators for polluted environments (Note: Ageing and failure modes are not taken into consideration in this discussion).
The importance is also shown of site pollution severity measurements, climatic conditions, identifying pollution type and practical use of data collected from natural pollution test sites, in-service insulators, laboratory pollution flashover tests and statistical evaluation.
An insulator is a mechanical support. After the mechanical aspects of a design have been finalized, electrical characteristics are added. If the insulator doesn’t keep your line in the air, all electrical characteristics in the world mean nothing. Mechanical characteristics are so important to the functioning of an insulator that they’re the one commonality in the marking of all insulator. Another question to take in account is the consequences of a mechanical failure: Loss of leakage distance only or cable fall. This depend of the design of the insulator. IEC stablish the mechanical residual test methods and acceptance criteria for glass or porcelain string insulators with the dielectric part breakage.
The use must determine the maximum loading that the line will ever apply to its insulator, including conductor weight, hardware weight, ice and wing loading, and other overload factors.
Suspension insulators are rated in terms of their Specified Mechanical Load (SML). Most manufacturers recommend that you never load the insulator to more than 50% of the Specified Mechanical Load (SML). The SML rating is a guaranteed minimum ultimate strength rating. Each batch of insulators produced is sampled for mechanical strength and all samples must meet or exceed the stated SML value and the statistical criteria. The routine test load is the proof load applied to each unit and also the maximum load that the insulator should ever see in service.
IEC -1 & IEC stablish the mechanical test methods and acceptance criteria for Ceramic or glass insulators units and Composite insulators respectively.
The electrical characteristics of the insulator are imparted by the air around it. This is principally defined by the arcing distance of the insulator defined as “shortest distance in the air external to the insulator between the metallic parts which normally have the operating voltage between them”.
The impulse withstand/flashover characteristics and dry power frequency characteristics are all based upon the dry arcing distance.
Some would argue that the wet power frequency withstand/ flashover characteristics are determined by leakage distance, but that argument only holds within a narrow band of leakage distances. Leakage distance plays a role, but only as a contributing factor.
IEC -1 recommend the withstand voltages associated with the highest voltage for the equipment
Last edition of series IEC TS has developed new techniques for the selection and dimensioning of high voltage insulators. It enables, after an established process, to determinate the most efficient insulation. The technical specification recommends three approaches to select suitable insulators based on system requirement and environmental conditions:
The applicability of each approach depends on available data, time and economics involved in the project.
Some of the parameters required for these approaches are mentioned on the following sub-chapter:
Figure 1 shows the relation between site pollution severity (SPS) class and RUSCD (reference unified specific creepage distance) for insulators. The bars are preferred values representative of a minimum requirement for each class and are given for use with approach 3 (measured and design) of the IEC/TS -1.
If the site pollution severities (SPS) are available, it is recommended to take a RUSCD (reference unified specific creepage distance) which corresponds to the position of the site pollution severity (SPS) measurements within the class by following the curve in Figure 1.
Basic USCD (mm/kV*)
* r.m.s. value of the highest operating
voltage across the insulator.
For Type A pollution (inland, desert or industrially polluted areas), SPS is calculated from ESDD/NSDD values.
For Type B pollution (coastal areas where salt water or conductive fog is deposited onto the insulator surface), SPS is calculated from SES (site equivalent salinity)
Different types of insulator and even different positions of the same insulator type may accumulate pollution at different rates in the same environment. In addition, variations in the nature of the pollutant may make some shapes of insulator more effective than others.
IEC TS -2 – Table 1 below shows a brief summary of the principal advantages and disadvantages of the main profile types with respect to pollution performance.
Antipollution profiles
IEC TS -2 – Tables 2 & 3 give simple merit values for ceramic and glass insulator profiles. Table 2 give the profile suitability, relative to standard profile assuming the same creepage distance per unit or string, Table 3 assuming the same insulating length.
Below tables show a brief summary of the principal advantages and disadvantages of the main profile types with respect to pollution performance.
Type A pollution: Solid pollution with non-soluble components.
Type B pollution: Liquid electrolytes with very little or no non-soluble components.
Also IEC TS -2 give profiles parameters to take in account:
IEC TS -3 – Chapters 8 & 9 give recommendations for polymer insulators profiles and parameter to take in account:
Pollution tests on glass and porcelain insulators on a laboratory can be carried out for two main objectives:
Featured content:IEC prescribe procedures for artificial pollution tests applicable to ceramic and glass insulators for overhead lines.
Two categories of pollution test methods are recommended for standards tests:
This standardized laboratory pollution test methods are not applicable for composite (polymeric) or RTV-coated insulators. A proposal for a test method for artificially polluted composite insulators is covered by the recent CIGRE TB 555: “Artificial Pollution Test for Polymer Insulators”.
In the case of naturally polluted insulators removed from the service a recent CIGRE TB 691 (WG D1.44), “Pollution Test of Naturally and Artificially contaminated insulators” summarizes the recent experience with so-called rapid flashover test methods:
Both tests can be applied for both ceramic (glass and porcelain) and composite insulators for both AC and DC.
The objective of these tests is a need for reliable diagnostic of naturally polluted insulators to evaluate their residual dielectric strength and also a general trend to make testing more cost-effective and time-efficient, even for the case of artificially polluted insulators.
A reduction of performance can be due to pollution in case of ceramic insulators or due to a combination of pollution and ageing in case of polymeric insulators. In both case cases the residual pollution strength should be quantified in terms of a flashover voltage, not a withstand voltage; because the withstand voltage does not provide the user by the information about the probability for flashover or standard deviation of flashover voltage.
Sometime, the combination of the many variable environmental parameters which influence an insulator’s behaviour over its lifetime are difficult to artificially simulate and, moreover, to accelerate. The validity of laboratory tests is thus often questions as the procedures adopted may not take into account significant factors which would be encountered in service or they may over-emphasise others.
The evaluation of insulator performance in naturally polluted outdoor test stations is becoming more important and popular. Although involving a longer test duration, and still requiring care in the correct interpretation of the test data, the results tend to be accepted with more confidence.
Outdoor test stations is also a good tool for new insulation technologies in which there is as yet no technical or normative specification for its testing or characterization.
CIGRE Technical Brochure No. 333, “Guide for the establishment of naturally polluted insulator testing stations” serve as a general guide for the establishment of natural test stations which will facilitate the overall comparison of various insulators designs, the explorations of particular aspects of insulator performance and/or the selections of the most appropriate insulation for a particular application. It is relates specifically to insulators intended for use under AC conditions but aspects are applicable to DC stations as well.
Typical test aims may be one or more of the following:
The severity of the pollution and the prevailing climate must be examined and should be representative of conditions found on the system. As is the case for laboratory tests, an over-acceleration of the ambient stresses can produce misleading results. Contamination severity assessment by means of ESSD and NSDD measurements and/or directional dust deposit gauges should be undertaken to ensure that an appropriate site is selected.
Insulator test stations have a wide range of size and sophistication and may be categorized as:
Photo 1: Permanent insulator research station at Martigues (France) and examples of Verescence La Granja Insulators tests
Photo 3: In-service insulator test structure
Leakage current activity (include number of flashovers experienced), climatic effects and pollution severity are usually monitored. In addition, the performance of the test samples should be judged by a regular inspection of the insulators: Close visual examination of the surface; an assessment of the hydrophobicity of the dielectric material and the viewing of electrical activity.
Insulators corrosion occurs if the surface of the insulators is polluted, and in the presence of humidity.
When the insulators surface is covered by deposit wet pollution, leakage currents start. Its amplitude is a function of the degree of pollution (the amount of soluble salts).
Polluted and wet insulators energized with AC voltage display a biased leakage current having a DC component that causes electrolytic corrosion of the pins.
Leakage currents effects are even more harmful when the frequency and duration of wet periods are high (humid tropical climate) and also when pollution finds a hygroscopic surface (Hence the importance of inert contaminants that absorb or retain humidity).
This corrosion is most important on DC voltage than AC voltage for same site, due to current unidirectional and electrostatic phenomena that cause the most important pollution deposition formation.
For insulators, dominant electrolytic corrosion effects add to those of atmospheric corrosion and those due to the formation of oxidising agents caused by the presence of arcs near fittings. These last ones can be initiated and maintained during periods of humidification and drying that precedes and succeeds in critical conditions or when the insulator is more humid. Protection field dispatcher accessories can be beneficial to limit these phenomena of humidification and drying periods which are a factor of acceleration of the insulator fittings corrosion for those pieces that are more electrically forced.
Corrosion phenomena result in:
The most severe corrosion cases occur especially in the tropical areas very near to the sea or marine pollution and areas where the pollution by dust accumulation happen for long periods without rain, plus the high environment humidity.
Insulators fittings corrosion may have the following effects:
Metal parts protections have been developed to avoid or delay corrosion phenomena.
They consist of reinforced galvanized fittings and of a sacrificial zinc sleeve protection.
Fig. 3: Detail of leakage current on insulator
IEC- specifies the minimum requirements for the zinc sleeve; anyway, it can be improved to increase it behaviour.
Fig. 4: Drawing and photo of a pin with zinc sleeve
Also IEC- specifies test method for the zinc sleeve control. Future work of normalization would have to be to include the zinc sleeve requirements and the tests methods on the IEC--1 (for a.c. lines)
The main objective of the overhead line maintenance policy in an electric company is to maintain the number of fault outages at reasonable values. A Data Base with the principal information of the insulation is an efficiency tool for the evaluation of performance. The information that this database should contain is:
Several maintenance indicators are habitual used by the utilities:
Also numerous methods of maintenance procedures are well-known by the utilities:
The evolution of maintenance indicators together with the results of inspections linked with the data base of the line help both the decision making regarding the maintenance or replacement of the insulation and the valuation / comparison of the different types of materials, profiles and manufacturers quality.
Insulators are high-technology products expected to work with high reliability over a long period of time. A great number of successfully balanced design parameter, analyzed in the previous chapters, choice of material as well as mastering of manufacturing processes are required to ensure this high long term reliability.
An insulator comes to the end of its working life either when it fails mechanically, flashover at unacceptably high frequency or gives evidence of deterioration to a condition likely to lower its factor of safety in service. All insulators are affected to some extend by impact, cycling but thermal and mechanical, deterioration from weathering and electrothermal causes, flexure and torsion, ionic motion, corrosion and dement growth.
Determinate the exactly time to replace if it necessary is important to optimise the cost of maintenance. There are a fairly large number of degradation modes. Some modes are easily detectable by visual inspection other, especially for porcelain insulators, need sophisticated methods. Degradation modes causes by easily detectable mechanism like slip of metal fitting, pin corrosion or surface erosion are considered to be reason for replacement of insulators.
CIGRE has established a test procedure to determinate the state of cap and pin and long-rod insulators and to decide on the safe time for their replacement: “Guide for the assessment of old cap and pin and long-rod transmission line insulators made of porcelain or glass: What to check and when to replace”. CIGRE Technical Brochure No. 306, .
This document stablishes a testing sequence with a number of non-destructive tests as visual tests (e.g. degree of corrosion) as well as dimension and thermal and the combined thermal-mechanical tests. This first series of tests is followed by destructive mechanical tests. A probability diagram based on normal distribution is used to analyse the failing load test results. With the probability (risk) for failure on the ordinate and the failing load on the abscissa, the failing load characteristics are represented as straight lines. In that way changes in strength become easily visible.
To help the user, the document includes a number of typical cases of analysis of test result called “Reference Scenarios”. They are useful for the assessment of the present condition of the insulator
The failing load characteristics are represented by:
The SFL (specified failing load) is marked with a solid vertical line.
For the example of ”Reference scenario F1” the reductions in strength shown in this example diagram are not representative of good quality products. Age and TMP-test have only negligible influence on good products.
Parallel to this document, another Technical Brochure published by CIGRE assist to evaluate the technical conditions of aged, old or failed composite insulators: “Guide for the assessment of composite Insulators in the laboratory after their removal from service”. CIGRE Technical Brochure No. 481. Different methods, philosophies and tools are descripted which enable a conclusion regarding the residual life-time of composite insulators of the same age and design family. The document also give indications of work for the case of an investigation a failure or a unit recognized as high risk and evaluation of units for research.
It is based on a recommended sequence of testing on samples taken out different stress zones of the line.
The selection of the insulator type is not a simple job, especially if the insulator will be install in a high polluted area.
Numerous documentations (IEC Standards, CIGRE Technical Brochure…) are available to help on the selection of the most appropriate insulator, for monitoring the behavior in operation and for the determination of the finite insulator life.
Different solutions are available to improve the insulator performance on high corrosion areas.
Several factors must be taken in account on the insulator type selection:
[1] IEC -471: International Electrotechnical Vocabulary. Part 471: Insulators
[2] IEC -1: Insulation co-ordination – Part 1: Definitions, principles and rules
[3] IEC : Artificial pollution tests on high-voltage ceramic glass insulators to be used on a.c. systems.
[4] IEC : Residual strength of string insulator units of glass or ceramic material for overhead lines after mechanical damage of the dielectric.
[5] IEC--1: Insulators for overhead lines with a nominal voltage above 1 000V: Ceramic or glass insulators units for a.c. systems – Definitions, test methods and acceptance criteria
[6] IEC/TS -1: Selection and dimensioning of high-voltage insulators intended for use in polluted condition – Part 1: Definitions, information and general principles
[7] IEC/TS -2: Selection and dimensioning of high-voltage insulators indented for use in polluted condition – Part 2: Ceramic and glass insulators for a.c. systems
[8] IEC/TS -3: Selection and dimensioning of high-voltage insulators indented for use in polluted condition – Part 3: Polymer insulators for a.c. systems
[9] IEC : Insulators for overhead lines – Composite suspensions and tension insulators for a.c. systems with a nominal voltage greater than 1 000 V – Definitions, test methods and acceptance criteria
[10] IEC-: Insulators for overhead lines with a nominal voltage above 1 000V: Ceramic or glass insulators units for d.c. systems – Definitions, test methods and acceptance criteria
[11] I. Gutman, Wallace Vosloo, “Development of Time-and Cost-Effective Pollution Test Methods Applicable for Difference Station Insulation Option”. IEEE Vol. 21, No. 6. TDEI submitted .
[12] M. Marzinotto, J-M. George, S. Prat, C. Lumb, F. Virlogeux, I. Gutman, and J. Lundengard, “Field Experience and Laboratory Investigation of glass Insulators Having a Factory-Applied Silicone Coating”, TDEI submitted .
[13] I. Gutman, J. Shamsujjoha, C. Lumb, J-M. George, and S. Roude: “Investigation of Rapid flashover solid layer pollution testing as an alternative to current standard method”, IEEE ISEI-, paper 17 pp.73-77
[14] CIGRE Task Force 33.04.07, “Natural and artificial ageing and pollution testing of polymeric insulators” CIGRE Technical Brochure No. 142,
[15] CIGRE WG B2.03, “Guide for the assessment of old cap and pin and long-rod transmission line insulators made of porcelain or glass: What to check and when to replace”. CIGRE Technical Brochure No. 306,
[16] CIGRE WG B2.03, “Guide for the establishment of naturally polluted insulator testing stations” CIGRE Technical Brochure No. 333,
[17] CIGRE WG B2.21, “Guide for the assessment of composite Insulators in the laboratory after their removal from service”. CIGRE Technical Brochure No. 481,
[18] CIGRE WG D1.44, “Pollution Test of Naturally and Artificially contaminated insulators” CIGRE Technical Brochure No. 691,
[19] Javier GARCIA /Philippe Platteau. Glass insulators in polluted environment: design, test, experiences and benchmarking with other materials. Cigre regional meeting outdoor insulation. Tunisia,
[20] R. García Fernández, M.A. Perez Louzao, I. Serrano “REE’s insulator global maintenance policy”, CIGRE ; B2-206.
Son aquellas cookies gestionadas exclusivamente por ICAI para garantizar el correcto funcionamiento de la web. La información que se recaba se emplea para mejorar tanto la calidad del web como su contenido y experiencia del usuario. Estas cookies son: Seguridad y aceptación de cookies.
These cookies are directly operated by ICAI to ensure the correct web operation. The information that collect is used to improve the quality of the web, the content of the website and user's experience. These cookies are: Security and accept cookies.
Are you interested in learning more about Composite Insulator? Contact us today to secure an expert consultation!
CookieDuraciónDescripciónA high voltage glass insulator is a specialized component used in electrical power transmission and distribution systems to support and isolate high voltage conductors from the tower and ground. These insulators are typically made of toughened glass, chosen for its high dielectric strength, which means it can withstand high voltages without breaking down. They are designed to prevent electrical energy from escaping the system, either through arcing or as heat.
Function: High voltage insulators provide the necessary insulation to keep high voltage conductors separated from the supporting structure (like a tower) and the ground, preventing electrical short circuits.
Material: They are often constructed from glass, specifically toughened glass, which is a type of glass that has been heat-treated to increase its strength and durability.
Design: These insulators come in various shapes and sizes, depending on the voltage and application. Some common designs include string insulators (used for high voltage power lines) and bushings (used in transformer connections).
Advantages: Glass insulators offer several advantages, including high mechanical strength, weather resistance, and the ability to easily detect defects like cracks, as they are transparent.
Applications: High voltage glass insulators are essential components in power transmission and distribution lines, substations, and other electrical infrastructure where high voltage insulation is needed.
High-voltage glass insulators are characterized by high dielectric strength, mechanical strength, resistance to environmental factors, and durability. They are designed to withstand high voltages without breakdown, are strong enough to support conductors, and can resist weathering, contamination, and other environmental conditions.
Weather Resistance: Glass insulators can withstand various weather conditions, including rain, snow, temperature fluctuations, and exposure to sunlight.
Resistance to Contamination: They are designed to resist the accumulation of dust, dirt, and pollutants, which can lead to flashover.
Chemical Inertness: Glass is chemically inert and resists corrosion and degradation from various chemicals.
Air Permeability: They allow for airflow, aiding in heat dissipation and preventing moisture buildup.
Low Maintenance: Their durability and resistance to environmental factors require minimal maintenance.
High voltage glass insulators are crucial in electrical systems for safety, stability, and efficient power transmission. They prevent short circuits, electric shocks, and power interruptions by mechanically holding conductors in place and preventing current leakage. Additionally, they help maintain the electrical system's stability and ensure safe operation by preventing current flow to unintended paths.
Safety: our glass insulator prevent electrical current from flowing to ground or unintended paths, which is vital for avoiding short circuits, electric shocks, and electrical fires.
Stability:glass electric insulators help maintain the electrical system's stability by preventing current leakage and ensuring that electrical energy is transmitted effectively.
Power Transmission: high voltage insulator ensure the reliable transmission of electricity by preventing current flow to ground and maintaining the integrity of the electrical system.
Mechanical Support: They provide physical support to electrical conductors, preventing them from sagging, falling, or damaging.
Preventing Electrical Discharge: Insulators protect against electrical hazards, such as electrical discharge and arcing, which can damage equipment and endanger personnel.
When selecting high-voltage glass insulators, consider mechanical strength, electrical properties, environmental factors, and economic factors to ensure reliable and safe performance. Key aspects include the voltage rating, mechanical load capacity, resistance to contamination, thermal stability, and ease of installation and maintenance.
1. Mechanical Strength:
Load Capacity, Residual Mechanical Strength, Design2. Electrical Properties:
Voltage Rating, Dielectric Strength, Creepage Distance, Leakage Distance:
3. Environmental Factors:
Resistance to Contamination, Weather Resistance, Thermal StabilityMechanical Parameters:
Mechanical breaking load: This refers to the maximum load the insulator can withstand before fracturing.
Coupling standard: This specifies the method used to connect the insulator to the tower or other components.
Diameter: This specifies the insulator's physical dimensions.
Dimensional Parameters:
Creepage distance: The distance along the insulator's surface that an electric arc can travel without causing a flashover.
Pitch: The spacing between the ribs or protrusions on the insulator.
Geometric Parameters: Insulator profile: The shape and configuration of the insulator, including the shape of the individual glass discs or segments.
Electrical Parameters: Dry and wet power frequency withstand voltages: The voltage the insulator can withstand under dry and wet conditions at normal power frequencies.
Lightning impulse withstand voltages: The voltage the insulator can withstand under lightning impulse conditions.
Flashover voltage: The voltage at which a disruptive discharge (flashover) occurs across the insulator.
High-voltage glass insulators are crucial components in power transmission systems, requiring careful installation and maintenance. Installation involves secure fastening to support structures with appropriate hardware and tools, while maintenance includes regular inspections for contamination and corrective actions.
Installation Process:
1. Secure Fastening: Insulators must be securely fastened to the supporting structures using appropriate hardware and tools, ensuring a robust and reliable connection.
2. Environmental Considerations: The installation process should take into account the specific environmental conditions, including pollution levels and weather patterns, to ensure long-term performance.
3. Proper Alignment: Insulators need to be properly aligned and spaced to ensure optimal performance and prevent electrical faults.
Maintenance Process:
1. Regular Inspection: Regular inspections are crucial for detecting any signs of contamination, damage, or deterioration, which can compromise insulation integrity.
2. Contamination Removal: In polluted environments, regular cleaning and washing of insulators are necessary to remove accumulated contaminants and maintain their insulating properties.
3. Coating Application: Applying coatings, such as silicone grease or RTV silicone rubber, can enhance the hydrophobicity of insulators, preventing water accumulation and reducing the risk of flashovers.
4. Partial Discharge Monitoring: Monitoring for partial discharges (PD) using acoustic or other advanced techniques can help identify potential problems and plan maintenance proactively.
5. Replacement: Damaged or deteriorated insulators should be replaced to maintain the reliability and safety of the system.
High voltage glass insulators are primarily made of high-quality toughened glass for their main insulation body. They also utilize metal fittings, such as cast iron, forged steel, cement, and stainless steel, for fastening and bonding, along with bonding materials.
Toughened Glass: The core of the insulator, providing high mechanical and thermal strength, and electrical insulation.
Metal Fittings: Used for connecting the insulator to transmission lines and other components. Common materials include cast iron, forged steel, stainless steel, and sometimes bronze.
Bonding Materials: Like aluminous cement, are used to secure the metal fittings to the glass, ensuring a robust and reliable connection.
Additional Materials: Some insulators might also incorporate other materials like zinc sleeves for corrosion resistance in harsh environments.
Raw Materials for Glass Production: Raw materials for producing the glass include silica, alumina, sodium carbonate, sodium sulfate, limestone, potash, and dolomite.
Contamination on high-voltage glass insulators, such as dirt, salt, or dust, significantly reduces their insulation performance by creating conductive paths and increasing the risk of flashover and power outages. These contaminants, combined with moisture, can lead to the formation of a conductive layer, allowing leakage current to flow and weakening the insulator's ability to withstand high voltages.
To mitigate the effects of contamination on high-voltage insulators, a multi-pronged approach is recommended. This includes regular cleaning, applying protective coatings, and adjusting insulator designs to improve performance under contaminated conditions.
1. Cleaning and Maintenance:
Washing: Regularly washing insulators with deionized water to remove contaminants is a common practice.
Blasting: Using blasting techniques to remove organic material and other pollutants can be effective.
Visual Inspections: Regular visual inspections help identify signs of degradation and contamination early on.
2. Protective Coatings:
Silicone Grease/Coatings: Using silicone grease or coatings on insulators can create a water-repellent and arc-track-resistant surface, encapsulating pollutants and improving long-term performance.
Room Temperature Vulcanization (RTV) Silicone Coatings: These coatings, especially in highly contaminated areas, offer excellent dielectric properties and flexibility, helping to reduce flashover risks.
3. Design and Material Considerations:
Hydrophobic Surfaces: Employing silicone rubber materials or other hydrophobic surfaces on insulators can improve performance under pollution and reduce leakage currents.
Creepage Distance Optimization: Adjusting the creepage distance (the distance an electric field can travel across the insulator surface) can improve the insulator's ability to withstand contaminated conditions.
Glass insulators stand out compared to other insulator types like ceramics and polymers due to their high dielectric strength, mechanical durability, and resistance to environmental factors. They offer superior electrical insulation and longer lifespans, contributing to a more sustainable and robust electrical system.
High-voltage glass insulators offer several environmental advantages, including a longer lifespan, recyclability, and reduced environmental impact compared to alternative materials like ceramic or composite insulators. Their durability and resistance to environmental degradation minimize waste and lower the consumption of natural resources. Additionally, they are easy to install and maintain, further reducing the environmental footprint associated with power transmission.
Nooa Electric is a major global manufacturer of glass insulators, used in power transmission lines and substations. These power line insulators prevent the flow of electricity between conductive components and grounded structures, ensuring safe and reliable power delivery. Nooa Electric is known for producing a wide range of glass insulators, including toughened glass insulators for high-voltage applications
best glass insulator solutions are tailored to specific needs, ranging from protecting against pollution and severe weather to enhancing thermal insulation and addressing particular application requirements.
Nooa Electric manufactures various types of glass power line insulators, including standard profile, anti-pollution profile, and aerodynamic types, as well as multi-umbrella and ground wire insulators. The details as below
Previous: What Do Helical Spiral Vibration Damper Manufacturers Offer?
Next: Vibration mitigation: New Force-Network based granular damping ...
Comments
Please Join Us to post.
0